Question 1 - Part d
In part D of this question, you'll learn how to identify and explain ethical issues in audit scenarios, then recommend appropriate actions—a requirement that regularly appears in exam questions.
This lesson is part of a paid course
Buy the course to unlock every video lesson and the AI Tutor, plus mock exams with feedback on CIMA courses.
Already bought? Sign in
Ask the AI tutor anything about this lesson
It knows every lesson in the course — explanations, clarifications, practice questions.
In this lesson
- 0:00 Understanding ethical issues in audits
- 0:45 Explaining threats beyond generic definitions
- 2:18 Safeguards versus prohibited actions
- 4:34 Investment advice and management threats
- 7:02 Non-audit services to audited entities
- 8:14 Management threat and familiarity risk
- 10:04 Self-interest threat from significant fees
- 12:10 Advocacy threat in financing advice
- 14:16 Consolidation adjustments and self-review
- 18:08 Routine versus complex accounting services
- 20:46 Applying code of ethics to actions
- 22:47 Earning professional marks through technique
About this lesson
This session focuses on exam technique: explaining threats using specific scenario details rather than generic textbook definitions, identifying which safeguards might reduce threats to acceptable levels, and knowing when the code of ethics prohibits certain services entirely. The video walks through two distinct ethical issues from the scenario: providing investment advice (which raises management, self-interest, and advocacy threats) and performing consolidation adjustments (which creates a self-review threat). You'll see how to structure each issue with a clear heading, explain the threat by linking it directly to the facts given, then recommend actions—whether safeguards or outright refusal to provide the service. A key insight: if the code of ethics says a service is prohibited or only permitted for routine or mechanical work, that determines your action immediately. The tutor emphasises that students often lose marks by stating threats without explanation or by using generic language that doesn't relate to the specific scenario. Your answer must show professional judgement: evaluating fee significance, assessing whether safeguards are genuinely effective, and demonstrating commercial awareness. By applying this structured approach and linking every point back to the facts provided, you'll not only secure marks for the requirement itself but also earn professional marks for communication, analysis, and scepticism—often the difference between a good pass and an excellent one.
Duration: 23m
Transcript
Every lesson comes with a full searchable transcript - included with the course.
Get the Advanced Audit and Assurance course
All 177 video lessons, an AI Tutor in every lesson and lifetime access.
Already bought? Sign in