Legal intention and doctrine of privity
In this lesson, you'll learn about two critical elements of contract law: legal intention and the doctrine of privity. You'll discover how courts determine whether parties genuinely intended to create a binding agreement, explore the key differences between social and commercial contracts, and understand when third
This lesson is part of a paid course
Buy the course to unlock every video lesson and the AI Tutor, plus mock exams with feedback on CIMA courses.
Already bought? Sign in
Ask the AI tutor anything about this lesson
It knows every lesson in the course — explanations, clarifications, practice questions.
In this lesson
- 0:00 Intention to create legal relations
- 0:32 Presumptions in social and commercial agreements
- 1:21 Rebutting presumptions: Merritt v Merritt
- 3:10 Commercial intent and Jones v Vernon's Pools
- 4:45 Doctrine of privity of contract
- 5:00 Third party exceptions to privity
- 6:44 Restrictive covenants and collateral contracts
- 8:06 Exam question: Binding offer to sell
- 11:34 Exam question: Counter offers explained
- 13:37 Exam question: Valid consideration
About this lesson
parties can or cannot enforce contractual rights. This content is essential for the Business and Technology (BT) module and forms the foundation for more advanced contract law topics. The lesson covers legal intention to create legal relations, starting with the two presumptions courts apply. For social agreements—like promises between family members or informal arrangements with friends—legal intention is not presumed unless you can provide clear evidence to the contrary. For commercial agreements, the opposite applies: courts presume legal intention unless you can prove otherwise. You'll work through real cases like Merritt v Merritt, where a separated couple's written agreement was upheld as binding despite the social relationship, and Jones v Vernon's Pools, where the "binding in honour only" clause meant no legal contract existed at all. The doctrine of privity establishes that only parties to a contract can sue or be sued on it. However, the lesson explores important exceptions: agency law, restrictive covenants, implied trusts, and collateral contracts. You'll see practical examples like how a bank with a restrictive covenant can prevent builders from altering a mortgaged property, and how Shanklin Pier successfully sued Dettol Products through a side agreement even though they weren't the original purchaser of the paint. The lesson concludes with exam-standard multiple choice questions that test your understanding of offers, counter-offers, and valid consideration.
Duration: 15m
Transcript
Every lesson comes with a full searchable transcript - included with the course.
Get the Corporate and Business Law course
All 76 video lessons, an AI Tutor in every lesson and lifetime access.
Already bought? Sign in